| Free
information from Dick's Cyberspace Mall, the
WORLD'S LARGEST
MALL You're visitor number
|
|
|
x Dick's Guide to Why U.S. District Court Judge Susan Webber Wright Could Never Find For Paula Jones Against Bill Clinton
Return to Welcome to Dick's Guides or Dick's Guide's Free Service for Research Reports and Questions or Dick's Guides to Free and Inexpensive -- or at least discounted -- Student Products and Student Servicesor Dick's Guide Resource Library or Money Making Opportunities for Students or How Older American Politicians, Lawyers and Bureaucrats Screw Young People, all the time
Dick's Guide to Free Magazines (You are a click away from getting access to a service that will send you magazines, for free!) America's Lawyer Judges are Screwing you every day. They substitue lawyer ethics for morality. U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright's, opinion -- on April Fool's Day 1998 -- dismissed Paula Jones' sexual harassment lawsuit against President Clinton. You can read Judge Susie's ruling by clicking here,but her decision was a forgone conclusion. Judge Wright is a 49 year old woman who has known Clinton for years. She was a student in a law course Clinton taught at the University of Arkansas in the early 1970s. She is a judge in Clinton's hometown, and has been exposed to his masculine physical attraction for years. She reportedly sought his attention in college to "correct" a grade he gave her. Hillary, Bill's college significant other, stepped in and gave Susan the "A" grade she wanted. At 49, Judge Wright's age put her with the two million women who fantasied about Clinton in 1998. The Leflein Associates poll displayed Clinton's romantic appeal as highest among women between the ages of 25 and 34, but continuing to those, like Susie, up to the ages of 55 to 64. The Judge had been exposed to Clinton's sexual magnetism in all her years. It seems that the now mature Judge Wright might suffer from the same winds of sexual attractions that blew young college graduate Monica Lewinsky into Washington. Judge Wright tipped her hand, or perhaps exposed her sexual fantasies, on January 23, 1998. She saved the president at that time by preventing Monica Lewinsky from being questioned by lawyers for Paula Jones. This allowed the judge to avoid hearing from Monica about a pattern of behavior by Clinton with young women. It also allowed her to avoid hearing from other women preyed upon by Clinton. Jone's lawyers wanted to show Clinton had used his political power to get sexual favors -- albeit willingly -- from Ms. Lewinsky. In addition, a pattern of lying by the president was apparent in his denials that he had an improper relationship with Lewinsky, just as he had falsely claimed he had no relationships with another woman, Gennnifer Flowers. He lied to all America about this woman with whom he had had a multi-year affair. Judge Wright's faith in Clinton's honesty must have been tested a few days after Lewinsky's deposition when Clinton admitted for the first time he had an affair with Gennifer Flowers. Apparently, Ms. Wright's feminine side underwent a spasm of denial. She completely rejected any thoughts about her teacher's lecherous womanizing. She simply refused to hear those who might tarnish her view of Clinton. A reasonable approach for a woman smitten by the love bug, but not proper for a serious judge. At first, she fought to prevent Clinton from coming to trial while he was President. She ruled that the case would be heard when it was convenient for the President. That lover decision was quickly overruled by the Supreme Court. It's clear that Ms Wright has been emotionally upset by having to preside over a case affecting the political future and reputation of her teacher. Her distaste for hearing from other women about Clinton's womanizing was explained by her husband, law professor, Robert Wright. He said his wife was "not going to permit just a parade of women from coming through her court. She is going to keep it pretty tight." To shed further insight into his wife's views he added "All reports indicate that his advances [toward Lewinsky] were not unwelcome -- that they were consensual, which is not what Paula Jones is alleging. From what I've heard, a lot of Bill Clinton's women have been satisfied customers." Ironically, at the time Professor Wright was speaking it's not clear whether he felt his wife had been one of Clinton's satisfied customers. Professor Wright also said he believed his wife would only allow testimony from "women who worked for the state or federal government" subjected to unwanted advances from Clinton. Yet, in the two weeks prior to Susan Wright's favorable decision for Clinton, two such women had stepped forward. It may be that Judge Wright, like Susan McDougal, sacrificed her future for her heart. Judge Wright rushed to her summary judgment just as such women were coming forward, once more suggesting she could not bear to hear testimony from ANY woman who derided the sexual behavior of her college professor. As judge she placed a gag order on the participants. This helped preserve some of Clinton's reputation. Her husband admitted this saying, "the gag order has served one useful purpose, to prevent the lawyers from commenting on the substance on TV." Judge Wright, in her opinion, did agree that "there are few more outrageous acts than a criminal sexual assault followed by unwanted exposure, coupled with a demand for oral sex by the most powerful man in the state against a very young, low-level employee," but, "the governor's alleged conduct does not constitute sexual assault. Rather, the conduct as alleged by plaintiff describes a mere sexual proposition or encounter, albeit an odious one, that was relatively brief in duration, did not involve any coercion or threats of reprisal and was abandoned as soon as plaintiff made clear that the advance was not welcome." The judge's spouse, Robert Wright, said, even before his wife's April Fool's Day finding, "Clinton should be pretty happy with her." And so should America's macho males. In the words of the court, when you use force to get a woman alone, expose yourself and ask for oral sex, as long as you let the woman go quickly, you make, "a mere sexual proposition ... albeit an odious one ... relatively brief in duration ... not involv(ing) any coercion or threats of reprisal." GO FOR IT GUYS! Judge Susie has given you the green light! This Altavista search for (judge+or+judges) and (errors+or+error+or+mistakes+or+mistakes) resulted in over 136,000 hits,
Low computer prices for Dick's Guides' users Click below if you need
to buy discounted
books
Dick's Guide to Free URL Registration Sites (I have used these sites to get free registration for Dick's Guides on various Search Engines. They work and they are free! Use them to spread the word about your Web Page.) Search Engines I have known and loved
THE LEGAL JARGON I SEEM TO NEED ON MY PAGES "Netscape, Netscape Navigator, Netscape ONE and the Netscape N and Ship's Wheel logos are registered trademarks of Netscape Communications Corporation in the United States and other countries. are also trademarks of Netscape Communications Corporation, which may be registered in other countries."
So be it x |
|
|
Bill Clinton's Guide to Seduction and Lovemaking
Techniques 
Books
Describing Bill Clinton's Character
Dick's Guide to the School of Seduction and
Lovemaking
a business you can start with
no money
a no cost opportunity to make
money and get the best long distance rates possible
to consolidate your debts
