Free information from Dick's Cyberspace Mall, the WORLD'S LARGEST MALL You're visitor number Hit Counter

Welcome to Dick's Guides

Dick's Guide to THE SUPREME COURT
1994-95 term, Ginsburg and Breyer voted together in 77.1 percent of cases in which the court's
decision was divided. Supreme Court appointees, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer are recognized
as lawless justices

President Clinton's Supreme Court justice
appointments
Supreme Court Book Mall

Summary: This is just one of Dick's Guide to the Supreme Court. This one addresses
President Clinton's Supreme Court justice appointments. You will also find detailed information here about
Ginsburg, Breyer, President Clinton, federal powers, criminal defendants, Clinton's appointees to the
Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, John Paul Stevens, David Souter,
Ginsburg and Breyer, Justice Antonin Scalia, federal ban on guns, near schools,
Adarand v. Pena, Ginsburg's dissenting opinion, joined by Breyer, racial preferences, lingering
effects of unconscious bias, appeals court other topics about the Supreme Court
as well as its cases and other topics in American history.

If there is still more information you need to know more about The Supreme Court or American history, or some class paper you
may be doing (or anything else important, like where can I get a free horoscope reading telling me whether or not to take the next
America history test) send me email at ramann2997@aol.com. If you need help with a paper be sure to tell me abou yourself,
the class you need the paper for, and when you need the paper. I try to help everyone, even when I can only direct you to good research sources.

President Clinton's Supreme Court justice appointments
Supreme Court Book Mall American History Book Mall

Synopsis: President Clinton's Supreme Court justice appointments

BREYER AND GINSBURG - LAWLESS SUPREME COURT APPOINTEES OF A LAWLESS PRESIDENT

President William Clinton was a lying, adulterous womanizer, with little respect for the truth or the law. It is
little wonder that his Supreme Court appointees, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer are also lawless justices.
While president, and chief law enforcement officer of the nation, Clinton thumbed his nose at the law, lied under oath,
and gave legal reasoning a bad name -- using his lawyer training to question the meaning of the word "is."
Ruth Bader Ginsburg has shown she has little use for the law and is quite willing to ignore it on issues involving
woman' rights. Breyer appears to show more respect for the law, but his legal reasoning reaches the depths of
sophistry, especially in his repeated defenses of big business.

PRESIDENT CLINTON'S LAWLESSNESS, SOME EXAMPLES

RUTH BADER GINSBURG'S LAWLESSNESS, SOME EXAMPLES

STEPHEN BREYER'S LAWLESSNESS, SOME EXAMPLES

REVIEW OF DECISION PATTERNS BY CLINTON JUSTICES BREYER AND GINSBURG

President Clinton's appointees to the federal courts have served less than two years, but so far their
decisions frequently take an expansive view of federal powers and side with criminal defendants.
An analysis of their votes shows that Clinton's appointees to the Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
and Stephen Breyer, side most frequently with each other and with justices considered "liberal"
-- John Paul Stevens and David Souter. In the 1994-95 term, Ginsburg and Breyer
voted together in 77.1 percent of cases in which the court's decision was divided.

Ginsburg sided with Justice John Paul Stevens 77.1 percent of the time, and Bryer in 64.6 percent of the cases.

By contrast, they both voted with conservative Justice Antonin Scalia in only 43.8 percent of the cases.
Their written opinions suggest few restrictions on federal power. For example, in U.S. v. Lopez, by a 5-to-4
vote the court restricted federal regulation of interstate commerce by striking down a federal ban on guns
near schools. Breyer disagreed, claiming Congress doesn't have to show an activity actually affects interstate
commerce in order to regulate it. In Adarand v. Pena, the court struck down race-based federal contract set-asides.
Ginsburg's dissenting opinion, joined by Breyer, claimed racial preferences didn't need to be justified by actual
discrimination, only the "lingering effects of unconscious bias." At the appeals court level, Clinton appointees can also
be comparedto non-Clinton judges, since decisions are rendered by three or more judges. In the Fourth Circuit Court of
Appeals, non-Clinton judges sided with criminal defendants 40 percent of the time, while Clinton judges sided with
criminal defendants 86 percent of the time. By April 1996, Clinton had appointed almost 25 percent of federal judges,
including two Supreme Court justices and, as of January 1996, 29 federal appeals court judges. Source: Clint Bolick,
"Cinton's Judges: A Preliminary Analysis," Issue Analysis Report #5, April 1996, Goldwater Institute,
Bank One Center-Concourse, 201 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85004, (602) 256-7018. "
SOURCE: National Center for Policy Analysis, Review of Decisions by Clinton Justices. http://www.ncpa.org/pd/law/lawa.html"

Clinton loses appeals in Lewinsky case

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court Monday let stand a ruling that says presidential confidant Bruce Lindsey and
other White House lawyers cannot refuse to answer a federal grand jury's questions about possible criminal conduct
by government officials.

Rejecting a White House appeal that stems from an investigation of President Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky,
the court turned away arguments that the attorney-client privilege of confidentiality extends to a president's White House
lawyers.

The action could open the door for independent counsel Kenneth Starr to question Lindsey about his conversations
with the president concerning Lewinsky, barring a White House decision to again raise the separate issue of executive
privilege. It also could allow Starr to obtain fresh evidence as impeachment proceedings against Clinton begin in Congress.

A federal appeals court panel, voting 2-1 last July, ruled that Lindsey cannot invoke the privilege "to withhold information
relating to a federal criminal offense."

White House counsel Charles Ruff called the court's action disappointing. "We continue to believe that the attorney-client
privilege should protect conversations between government officials and government attorneys," he said.

In a separate case, the court refused to shield Secret Service officers from having to testify to federal grand juries
about information they learn while protecting the president.

Both cases were rejected by 7-2 votes.

In other action Monday, the court:

	Sidestepped a divisive national debate over education as it let Wisconsin continue providing financial help for families whose children attend private schools, even those affiliated with religious groups. The justices left intact the state's providing tuition vouchers - good for up to $5,000 a year per child - for students who attend private schools in Milwaukee.
	Agreed to decide whether police who take news reporters into people's homes, or onto their private property, while seeking to make an arrest can be sued for violating the residents' constitutional rights.
	Refused to revive a reverse-discrimination lawsuit in which nine white Chicago firefighters said they unlawfully were passed over for promotion in favor of blacks and Hispanics.

In the Secret Service case, the court turned away Clinton administration arguments that such a "protective-function privilege"
is needed to ward off presidential assassins.

A federal judge and a three-judge appeals court panel previously ruled against the administration's claim of privilege,
and more than a dozen Secret Service members testified before the grand jury investigating Clinton's relationship with
Lewinsky, a former White House intern.

In the lawyer-privilege case, the justices were told, "We stand now upon the brink of the most serious confrontation
between branches of government contemplated in our constitutional order.

"The president's need for confidential consultations with White House counsel in preparation for proceedings
designed to remove him from office can scarcely be questioned," the justices were told by W. Neil Eggleston, a private
lawyer for Clinton, and by Ruff.

The appeals court panel ruled that the privilege does not apply to the official legal advice given by government lawyers.
"The public interest in honest government and in exposing wrongdoing by government officials ... lead to the conclusion
that a government attorney may not invoke the attorney-client privilege" in criminal investigations, the lower court said.

Judges Judith Rogers, a Clinton appointee, and Bush appointee A. Raymond Randolph comprised the panel's majority.
Judge David Tatel, another Clinton appointee, dissented. He said the ruling would force presidents to confide in private
lawyers rather than White House counsel.

The July decision left open the possibility that Lindsey could invoke executive privilege in refusing to answer grand jury
questions.

Lindsey, who advised Clinton throughout the Lewinsky investigation conducted by Starr, has appeared before a federal grand
jury four times, most recently in August. He has refused to answer certain questions each time.

Two other White House lawyers also have balked at answering Starr's questions.

Starr urged the justices to reject the appeal. "The historical and legal foundations for the White House's privilege claim
are nonexistent," he argued. "To our knowledge, no case, statute, rule or agency opinion - ever - has concluded that a
department or agency of the United States (or any state government entity) can maintain a governmental attorney-client
privilege in federal criminal or grand jury proceedings," he said.

Starr's office had argued in the appeals court that the need for relevant evidence of encouraging perjury, obstruction of
justice or witness tampering overrode the White House's claim of lawyer-client confidentiality.

In the Secret Service case, the appeals court ruled that administration lawyers had failed to show "with the compelling
clarity required ... that failure to recognize the proposed privilege will jeopardize the ability of the Secret Service effectively
to protect the president."

Such privileges shield spouses from having to testify against each other, and also protect confidentiality between lawyers
and their clients, doctors and their patients, clergy and the people they give spiritual advice.

After the appeals court's ruling in July allowed Starr and his staff to interrogate Secret Service members, at least one
uniformed officer was asked about an incident in which he and a White House aide supposedly found Lewinsky and the
president alone in the Oval Office suite.

But for the most part, according to interviews with lawyers, a former agent and a current member of the corps, prosecutors
used the agents and officers as human time clocks and security cameras.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer, the highest court's only two Clinton appointees,
voted to grant review to both administration appeals.

The cases are Office of the President vs. Office of Independent Counsel, 98-316, and Rubin vs. U.S., 98-93.

By The Associated Press

Supreme Court index

	Go to Washington news
	Go to News front page

SOURCE: USA Today http://www.usatoday.com/news/court/nscot896.htm

THURSDAY, JULY 9, 1998

Clinton's Justices Pave Supreme Court's Middle Road

With another term under their belts, two newest jurists brake court's rightward momentum.

Robert Marquand
Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

WASHINGTON

Of the nine justices on the United States Supreme Court, Republican presidents named seven and President Clinton - the first Democrat in the Oval Office since 1980 - named two.

Now, as history begins to define Mr. Clinton's legacy, his appointments of Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer may win a spot near the top of his achievement list.

Without doubt, the Clinton appointees are acting as the brake on a court that was moving rapidly toward cultural conservatism and limits on individual rights, say many court observers. Especially when the justices cannot reach consensus, as is often the case, the two newest members are steering the court in a more mainstream direction.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: She carries weight on gender issues.
(AP/FILE)

"Without [Justices] Ginsburg and Breyer, you have a radically different jurisprudence on the court," says David O'Brien, who publishes an annual Supreme Court review. "Voting rights and affirmative action are overturned completely. More acts of Congress are overturned. You would see a reversal of Roe v. Wade [affirming a woman's right to abortion]."

Other cases that might have turned out differently include one from the Virginia Military Institute (VMI), in which the court struck down all-male public colleges. The two newcomers frown on the death penalty, but have not tried to abolish it. They favor drawing voter districts in a way that considers race, but not ardently.

As Ginsburg begins her sixth year and Breyer his fifth on the Supreme Court, the pair is helping to shape a strong moderate wing. Moreover, with an impeccable civility and quiet demeanor, they are tempering a body that had been riven with ideological fissures and personal antipathy, sources close to the court say.

Of the two, the biggest surprise may be Breyer, a federal judge and Harvard professor who joined the court in 1994. Breyer was early labeled a gray legal technocrat. Yet his ringing dissent in the recent line-item-veto case and his role as lead dissenter in last year's epic term show him emerging as a questioner of states' rights and "original intent" - the leading vision of jurisprudence coming from the conservative wing. In dissenting with the majority decision to strike down the presidential line-item veto, Breyer contrasts the size of the US population, budget, and government in 1789 with the vastly larger conditions today. Whereas the majority held that the new presidential power violated the Constitution's "separation of powers," Breyer argues that the literal reading should not prevail and that the court should remember the "genius of the Framers' pragmatic vision ... in cases that find constitutional room for necessary ... innovation." The Constitution, he says, was framed to be an evolving document.

JUSTICE STEPHEN BREYER: He's hitting stride as pragmatic critic of the right.
(CHRIS GARDNER/AP)

Ginsburg, confirmed in 1993, is a steady moderate whose main impact is in gender issues. Her majority opinion in the VMI case broke new ground in equal protection for women, but overall she has taken on fewer fights than Breyer has. Of the four core justices of the moderate wing, which includes Bush appointee David Souter and Ford appointee John Paul Stevens, Ginsburg is probably the most conservative, particularly in criminal law. She epitomizes a new "judicial restraint" on the left, argues Jeffrey Rosen of the The New Republic. In one sense, this tempered position may make Ginsburg an ideal candidate for chief justice if William Rehnquist should resign and if a Democrat appoints his successor.

"Breyer is hitting his stride. He's found his voice as the pragmatic modern critic of the Rehnquist court," says Tom Baker at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa. "Ginsburg seems to be a kind of left analog of [Justice Sandra Day] O'Connor, the swing vote, which is a strong position to be in."

Breyer, who spent most of his life in Cambridge, Mass., is married to a member of the British aristocracy. He has a reported fondness for Humphrey Bogart films. Friends say he's a brilliant thinker who at Harvard had a red Chevrolet he was generous about lending. He was counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee in the late '70s, where he wrote the airline-deregulation law - and where he developed an expertise on Congress that regularly appears in his opinions.

Justice Breyer has 'found his voice as the pragmatic modern critic of the Rehnquist court.'
- Tom Baker, Drake University

Ginsburg, known as the Thurgood Marshall of women's legal rights, is from Brooklyn, New York. She spent 10 years as a professor at Columbia University and slightly more on the US Court of Appeals in Washington. Her husband is a Washington lawyer, and the two are avid opera fans who often travel to music festivals during the summer. She is controversial in some liberal circles for criticizing the grounds on which Roe v. Wade was decided.

BOTH appointees are lively on the bench. During argument in one case this term, which asked whether an American father of a foreign-born, out-of-wedlock child could later claim US citizenship for the child (a right mothers already have), Ginsburg delivered a set of legal body blows to Justices Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia. When the lawyer for the father faltered under fire from the two jurists, Ginsburg took over the entire position of advocacy for the lawyer.

This give and take on the bench represents a new esprit de corps on the Rehnquist court, one the two newcomers have cultivated. Some observers say they bring a more open discourse to the oral arguments, which had tapered off during the 1980s, reflecting a sullenness that matched the ideological strife in chambers. Indeed, they say, Ginsburg's and Breyer's willingness to "mix it up" with other members during arguments may be playing a bigger role in affecting how the justices ultimately cast their votes.

Before bookmarking this page in your browser, click here.

The URL for this page is:
http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/1998/07/09/fp1s3-csm.htm

For further information:

Supreme Court Justices of the United States

Supreme Court Justices Court TV

FindLaw: Supreme Court News

Supreme Court News Law Journal EXTRA

SOURCE: The Christian Science Monitor, July 9, 1998 http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/1998/07/09/fp1s3-csm.htm or http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/1998/07/09/fp1s3-csm.htm

RAY ARCHER: With Clinton appointing judges, can we afford 4 more years?

Copyright © 1996 Nando.net
Copyright © 1996 The Arizona Republic

(Oct 22, 1996 01:02 a.m. EDT) If the polls are correct, America is in for four more years of Bill Clinton. Not to worry, the reasoning goes, a Congress likely in Republican hands will keep Clinton and his merry band of White House activists from imposing any liberal lunacy on the country.

Yet a president doesn't necessarily need a compliant Congress to push his agenda when he can count on an activist judiciary for the job.

In California a few years ago, the liberal-leaning 9th Circuit Court of Appeals interpreted the Constitution's "promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty" Preamble to mean that welfare benefits could not be trimmed.

Any reduction in payouts to welfare recipients, the court ruled, would put families on the dole at "increased risk of homelessness, inadequate nutrition and a variety of emotional and physical problems" and would be unconstitutional.

In other words, the court found that welfare recipients in California had not just a constitutional claim to the earnings of taxpayers, but the right to expect the taxpayers to maintain a certain level of sustenance.

Juxtapose such reasoning, which stopped welfare reform in its tracks in California, with Clinton's promise to "fix" the landmark welfare reform legislation passed by Congress this year and you might get an inkling of what's a stake in the upcoming November vote.

Clinton already has replaced about a quarter of the federal judiciary in his three-plus years in office. If re-elected, Clinton-appointed judges along with holdover Carter appointees could conceivably hold a majority of seats on the federal bench by the time he leaves office and shift the all-important balance at the U.S. Supreme Court.

As it stands now with two Clinton appointees, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Steven Breyer, to the high court, critical rulings on such important issues as congressional redistricting, racial preferences, regulatory power, religious expression and private property rights have been decided by 5-4 votes.

With speculation rife about the retirements of three justices, Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Associate Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and John Paul Stevens, by the turn of the century, those votes could easily go the other way.

The media, which regularly substitute the code word "moderate" for liberal these days, describe Ginsburg and Breyer as such. But as the Institute for Justice's Clint Bolick noted in an analysis for the Phoenix-based Goldwater Institute, Ginsburg and Breyer have expressed views, particularly on civil rights issues, "virtually identical to former Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall, the most liberal members of the court in their time." Just one more Clinton appointee, Bolick says, "could swing the Supreme Court sharply to the left."

The same could be said of the potential for the lower federal courts. A review of the records of nearly 200 judicial appointees, Bolick says, reveals that "Clinton judges tend to be: more sympathetic to criminal and criminal defendants, more inclined to favor civil rights plaintiffs and expansive civil rights remedies, more disposed to plaintiffs in civil liability lawsuits and more hospitable generally to novel legal theories and to a more sweeping exercise of judicial power."

Anecdotal evidence abounds, including Judge Harold Baer, the Clinton-appointee who threw out evidence from a police narcotics search when he found it "reasonable" for drug dealers to flee from police in the inner city. With such reasoning, is it any wonder that the drug war is ineffective?

Can we risk four more years of Clinton? You be the judge.

(Ray Archer is an editorial writer for the Arizona Republic. He can be reached at archercolaol.com)

SOURCE: Nando Times. http://archive.nandotimes.com/newsroom/ntn/voices/102296/voices1_27397.html

Justices Reject Higher Standard for Lawsuits Against Officials
New York Times; New York; May 5, 1998; Linda Greenhouse;

Edition:	Late Edition (East Coast)
Section:	A
UMI Publication No.:	05051454
Start Page:	20
Column Number:	01
Page Count:	0
Text Word Count:	1051
Document Type:	News
Source Type:	NEWSPAPER
ISSN:	03624331
Subject Terms:	Civil rights Public officials Supreme Court decisions Civil actions Prisoners Correctional personnel
Dateline:	WASHINGTON, May 4
Personal Names:	Crawford-El, Leonard Rollon
Companies:	Supreme Court-US
UMI Article Re. No.:	NYT-2774-17
UMI Journal Code:	NYT

Abstract:
The 5-to-4 decision, a rare victory for the Court's diminished liberal bloc, stood recent Congressional arguments about judicial activism on their heads. While in Congress the conservative contention is that liberal judges are the ones inventing new law, in this case, it was the other way around, in the view of Justice John Paul Stevens and the four others who joined his majority opinion: Justices David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer and -- most significant to the outcome -- Anthony M. Kennedy, who rarely joins this group.

The Court decided in favor of a local prison inmate who is claiming that a District of Columbia corrections officer retaliated against him for giving newspaper interviews about prison conditions. The majority rejected the position of the Clinton Administration and a coalition of 34 state attorneys general, who argued for a new standard of proof that would make it easier to get lawsuits like this one dismissed before trial.

At issue was whether suits that allege an unconstitutional motive on the part of a government official should be subject to a higher standard of proof than that in other civil lawsuits. While the plaintiff in this case was a prison inmate -- a convicted murderer serving a life sentence -- the decision was not limited to prison litigation, applying as well to any suit alleging an unconstitutional motive, like race or sex discrimination, on the part of a public official.

SOURCE: Linda Greenhouse, New York Times New York; May 5, 1998 http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?Did=000000029197182&Fmt=1&Deli=1&Mtd=1&Idx=10&Sid=1&RQT=309

The Clinton clones: Ginsburg, Breyer, and the Clinton legacy /
Author: O'Connor, Karen.; Palmer, Barbara. Source: Judicature v. 84 no5 (Mar./Apr. 2001) p. 262-73

A 'representative' Supreme Court? The Thomas, Ginsburg, and Breyer appointments /
Author: Perry, Barbara A. 1956- (Barbara Ann),; Abraham, Henry J. Source: Judicature v. 81 no4 (Jan./Feb. '98) p. 158-65 Libraries: 680

You can't always get what you want: reflections on the Ginsburg and Breyer nominations /
Author: Silverstein, Mark, 1947-; Haltom, William. Source: The Journal of Law & Politics v. 12 (Summer '96) p. 459-79 Libraries: 309

1993 SC Ginsburg appointed

Book Store featuring Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Breyer and Ginsburg Sources

1. Ginsburg, Breyer richest justices on Supreme Court (6-5-1998)
June 5, 1998 Ginsburg, Breyer richest justices on Supreme Court DANIEL KURTZMAN Jewish Telegraphic Agency WASHINGTON -- Looking at the net worth of each of the nation's nine top jurists, this much can be said with certainty: You won't find Justice R
7/6/1998 http://www.jewishsf.com/bk980605/usrichest.htm
See results from this site only.

2. Guide to Government | US Federal Government
United States Government: Judicial Branch US Supreme Court Term of Office Lifetime appointment by president Qualifications Nominated by the president, approved by the Senate. Salary Chief Justice $171, 500 Associate Justices $164, 100 Functio
4/3/1998 http://www.echonyc.com/~mcghee/lwvnj/guide/uscourt.html
See results from this site only.

3. Supreme Court Justices Ginsburg, Breyer To Discuss Influence of Law School on Their Careers
Related Information The Grand Symposium is the featured event of The Great Columbia Law School Celebration, which takes place on Thursday, September 26, 1996. Where to Find It Information on the Grand Symposium is accessible on the Columbia Law S
9/27/1996 http://www.columbia.edu/cu/1996/0926/b.html
See results from this site only.

4. supreme court
Justices of the Supreme Court Justice Year Appointed Appointed By Age William Rehnquist 1972 Richard Nixon 74 John Paul Stevens 1975 Gerald Ford 78 Sandra Day O'Connor 1981 Ronald Reagan 68 Antonin Scalia 1986 Ronald Reagan 62 Anthony Kennedy 1988
9/29/2000 http://www.obcgs.com/supcourt.html
See results from this site only.

5. http://fermi.clas.virginia.edu/~ljs/justices.txt
Supreme Court Justices The Supreme Court (as of 1996) Ideology Justice Appointing President Moderate Liberal John Paul Stevens Ford Ruth Bader Ginsburg* Clinton Stephen G. Breyer Clinton ________
6/17/1997 http://fermi.clas.virginia.edu/~ljs/justices.txt
See results from this site only.

6. Current Justices
Copyright© Supreme Court Historical Society Photo by Richard W. Strauss Smithsonian Institute Current Justices Seated, left to right: Associate Justices Antonin Scalia, and John Paul Stevens, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, Associate Ju
7/3/2001 http://www.supremecourthistory.org/fp/current justices.htm
See results from this site only.

7. SUPREME COURT PICTURE
Justices of the United State Supreme Court Front row: Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice John Paul Stevens, Chief Justice William Hubbs Rehnquist, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice Anthony McLeod Kennedy. Back row: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Just
11/10/1998 http://www.deltast.edu/~gjenning/COURSES/JUDIPRO/SUPCORT/supcort3.htm
See results from this site only.

8. Van Impe Intelligence Briefing October, 1998 europe.html
To spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ(I Corinthians 15:3, 4), the message of His soon return(Titus 2:13), and the truth of the Bible(II Timothy 3:16) to all peoples in all nations(Acts 1:8) using all available resources to bring Him honor and glory(Co
6/13/2001 http://www.jvim.com/IntelligenceBriefing/oct1998/europe.html
See results from this site only.

9. Supreme Court Justices - Bethany Van Alstine's Page
Guide to justices both recent and past features photographs, biographies, and related links.
11/21/1999 http://www2.cybernex.net/~vanalst/supreme.html
See results from this site only.

10. http://www.lps.org/instruction/SS/9html/LPWho'sWho3branches.html
Who's Who in the 3 branches - 1997 Executive Branch Cabinet Departments of State Secretary Madeleine Albright Departments of Defense Secretary William Perry Departments of Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin Departments of Housing and Urban Development
7/20/2001 http://www.lps.org/instruction/SS/9html/LPWho'sWho3branches.html
See results from this site only.

11. Redistricting Rulings
Redistricting Rulings Shaw v. Hunt The Supreme Court's June 13, 1996, decision invalidating the 12th Congressional District. The majority opinion written by Chief Justice William Rehnquist A dissent written by Justice John Paul Stevens A separate d
7/9/2001 http://www.nando.net/insider/redistrict/redistrict.html
See results from this site only.

12. C-SPAN: America & the Courts
SITE INDEX TV Schedule | LIVE TV/Radio | Community | Classroom | Affiliates | Shop | About C-SPAN Pick a Series Washington Journal America & the Courts American Politics American Political Archive LBJ White House Tapes Current Events 107th
8/13/2001 http://www.c-span.org/courts.htm
See results from this site only.

13. The Indicator Vol.3 Num.5 Profiles of Power
Profiles of Power Volume 3 , Number 5 Prev | Contents | Next Profiles of Power: The Supreme Court by Jeffrey Tapick The Supreme Court is one of the most powerful institutions in America, yet it is one of the least examined elements of our fe
4/25/1997 http://www.amherst.edu/~indicate/3_5/pop.html
See results from this site only.

14. Famous Jews: Lawyers, Attorneys and Judges
This is an interactive list of famous Jewish Lawyers, Attorneys and Judges. You may vote for your favorites, and see what the rest of the world thinks!
8/15/2001 http://www.yahoodi.com/famous/law1.html
See results from this site only.

15. 2000 GOVERNMENT DIRECTORY of FEDERAL OFFICIALS
2001 GOVERNMENT DIRECTORY of FEDERAL, STATE and LOCAL OFFICES of the LEHIGH VALLEY Compiled by the League of Women Voters In this Directory, (R) denotes Republican Party, (D) denotes Democratic Party. Dollar figures denote salary or stipend of of
3/30/2001 http://www.lwvlv.org/govdir_fed.htm
See results from this site only.

16. Quik Internet
Entertainment Family Entertainment Movies Restaurants TV Guide Kids World Games, Fun! World's Best Game Downloads Health & Fitness Online Travel Sports Stock Market Shopping A New Home Books Cars & Accessories Classifieds Flowers & Gifts Music CD's
3/3/2000 http://www.quik.com/news/us/msg.1481.html
See results from this site only.

17. Supreme Court of the United States
Government Information Center Tucson-Pima Public Library . . . . . . . . . Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court, 1 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20543-002 Public Information Office 1-202-479-3000 Supreme Court Justices (
7/31/2001 http://www.lib.ci.tucson.az.us/government/Supreme.htm
See results from this site only.

18. Ben's Guide (6-8): Games and Activities -- Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court Word Scramble
Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court Word Search There are nine sitting justices on the Supreme Court of the United States. One serves as chief justice. Find the names of the men and women currently serving on the Court by looking
11/20/2000 http://bensguide.gpo.gov/6-8/games/justices.html
See results from this site only.

19. Step 9 of a Federal Prosecutor's Job
GRAPHICS VERSION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS "INSIDE THE COURTROOM" - A SERIES OF WEB PAGES FOR KIDS Steps of a Federal Prosecutor's Job INVESTIGATION | DECISION TO CHARGE | INITIAL
7/27/2000 http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/kidspage/text/step9.html
See results from this site only.

20. AU Press Release June 14, 1999
For Immediate Release June 14, 1999 Contact Joseph Conn Rob Boston Back to Press Releases Back to AU Home Page HIGH COURT'S DECISION TO HEAR LOUISIANA PAROCHIAL SCHOOL AID CASE SETS STAGE FOR MAJOR CHURCH-STATE SHOWDOWN, SAYS AMER
2/9/2001 http://www.au.org/press/pr61499.htm
See results from this site only.

21. Understanding the Federal Courts
The Supreme Court The Supreme Court of the United States consists of nine justices appointed for life by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. (See Figure 2. ) One justice is appointed as the Chief Justice and has additiona
5/28/1998 http://www.uscourts.gov/understanding_courts/8995.htm
See results from this site only.

22. Supreme_Courts
The Highest United States Courts United States Supreme Court U.S. Supreme Court's Home Page U.S. Supreme Court current list of Opinions Supreme Court Decisions: Legal Info Institute Findlaw Supreme Court Center Cornell U. Supreme Court Coll
6/6/2001 http://www.nightscribe.com/Law/highest_courts.htm
See results from this site only.

23. http://www.usatoday.com/news/court/nscot793.htm
Value of justices` assets Here is the value of assets reported by the nine Supreme Courtjustices in their 1997 financial disclosure forms released thisweek. The values are reported in ranges, not as precise figures, and do not inclu...
8/19/2001 http://www.usatoday.com/news/court/nscot793.htm
See results from this site only.

24. COSMIC BASEBALL ASSOCIATION- Personal Cosmic Game Report- Supreme Court @ Supreme Courtesans
Supreme Court @ Supreme Courtesans A Personal Cosmic Game Supreme Courtesans Win, 4-3 Line-Ups Supreme Court Supreme Courtesans 1 Antonin Scalia Rightfield 1 Metaneira Thirdbase 2 Clarence Thomas Catcher 2 Neaera Centerfield 3 Sandra Day O'Connor S
12/2/2000 http://worldzone.net/arts/cba/scourt.html
See results from this site only.

25. Virtual Supreme Court Home Page
Welcome to Virtual Supreme Court Home Page. The Virtual Supreme Court ("VSC") was created by Penn Law Professor Barbara Bennett Woodhouse as a teaching tool to explore the role of the judiciary in deciding how to interpret the words of the Constitu
4/27/1999 http://www.law.upenn.edu/fac/bwoodhou/vsc
See results from this site only.

26. Judicial Branch
The Almanac of Politics and Government's on-line information about the U.S. judicial branch, including the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, U.S. district courts, and judicial agencies.
5/14/2001 http://www.polisci.com/almanac/judicial.htm
See results from this site only.

27. PRESS RELEASE Nº 45/98 : THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VISITS THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
Press and Information Division PRESS RELEASE Nº 45/98 3 July 1998 THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VISITS THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE The delegation comprising Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony M. Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
1/20/1999 http://europa.eu.int/cj/en/cp/cp98/cp9845en.htm
See results from this site only.

28. Prentice Hall School | Social Studies Update | Spring 2000
Supreme Court Update HISTORICAL OVERVIEW WHAT'S IN THE NEWS? ACTIVITIES LINKS TO RELATED SITES CORRELATIONS TO PRENTICE HALL TITLES HISTORICAL OVERVIEW Justices of the Supreme Court are not elected by the voters, but by the President who nominates t
6/21/2001 http://www.phschool.com/curriculum_support/ss_update/spring00/supreme.html
See results from this site only.

29. OnPolitics: Supreme Court -- Current Justices
HISTORY/Current Justices Front Political News Elections The Issues Federal Page The Administration Congress - Governors Supreme Court History Current Justices - Past Justices - Choosing Cases - Oral Arguments - Making Decisions - Historic Case
6/7/2001 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/supcourt/history/current.htm
See results from this site only.

30. Members of the United States Supreme Court
JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA This list is in alphabetical order Picture Name Birthdate/Place Law School Nominated By/Year Stephen Breyer August 15, 1938 San Francisco, CA Harvard Law School, LL.B., magna cum laude, 1
11/4/2000 http://www.walrus.com/~rcgwcwu/s_court.htm
See results from this site only.

MediaWatch -- 07/01/1995 -- Front Page: Some Reporters Deny Supreme Court Has Any Liberal Justices
From the July 1995 MediaWatch Front Page Some Reporters Deny Supreme Court Has Any Liberal Justices The "Slash and Burn" Supremes Disappointment with the Supreme Court's latest decisions permeated media coverage as June drew to a close. "The Uni
7/1/1995 http://www.mediaresearch.org/news/mediawatch/1995/mw19950701p1.html
See results from this site only.

. US Supreme Court rulings attack democratic rights
Enter email address to receive news about the WSWS Add Remove SEARCH WSWS English German ON THE WSWS Editorial Board New Today News & Analysis Workers Struggles Arts Review History Science Polemics Philosophy Correspondence A
7/7/2001 http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/jun1999/sup-j25.shtml
See results from this site only.

. ACLU Newswire: 05-15-00 -- Supreme Court Strikes Down Federal Rape Law
May 15, 2000 -- Supreme Court Strikes Down Federal Rape Law WASHINGTON, DC -- The Supreme Court today threw out a law that let rape victims sue their attackers in federal court, saying that, by passing the law, Congress wrongly trampled on an area o
6/28/2001 http://www.aclu.org/news/2000/w051500a.html
See results from this site only.

________________________________________________________________

More Supreme Court Resources

Storm Center, David M. O'Brien. Norton. Fifth Edition Click here for Storm Center, price $23.45

Reason in Law. Lief F. Carter and Thomas Burke. 2002 Longman. Sixth edition. Click here for textbook binding, 1999 (fifth edition) at $37.40 - used books less

http://supct.law.cornell.edu/

http://ls.wustl.edu

http://findlaw.com/

http://www.c-span.org/

The Federalist Papers. Hamilton, Madison and Jay. Click here to get the federalist papers downloaded for just $2.65 Click here for a paperback copy of the Federalist Papers for $5.35

Justices of the Supreme Court - LII
Legal Information Institute at Cornell University offers a group photo of the 1998-99 US Supreme Court justices with links to bios and decisions.
supct.law.cornell.edu

Supreme Court Justices - Bethany Van Alstine's Page
Guide to justices both recent and past features photographs, biographies, and related links.
www2.cybernex.net

Supreme Court Justices - Oyez Project
Directory offers biographical profiles and judicial opinions of justices past and present.
oyez.nwu.edu

USA Today - Facts About US Supreme Court Justices
Explore a photograph gallery with biographical data for each of the current Supreme Court jurists. Includes links to news and archives.
www.usatoday.com

Members of the Supreme Court of the United States
News Weather Horoscopes E-mail Visit our sponsors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Find your Ancestry Fast! . . . . . All Infoplease All Almanacs General Entertainment Sports Biographies Dictionary En
www.infoplease.com

Portraits of Supreme Court Justices
Portraits of Supreme Court Justices (Serving on the Court since 1911) Chief Justices (years of service) Edward Douglas White - 1910-1921 (A.J. 1894-1910) William Howard Taft - 1921-1930 Charles Evans Hughes - 1930-1941 (A.J. 1910-1916) Harlan Fiske
www.stolaf.edu

PoliSci.com - Supreme Court Justices
Peruse a roster of judges, featuring dates of birth and death, the president who appointed each justice, term dates, and each justice's religion.
www.polisci.com

The Supreme Court, Justice's working conditions

(1803) The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court may declare laws of congress
unconstitutional, Marbury v Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
covering Marbury, Madison, 5 U.S. 137

AH1994, May 14, Supreme Court: and Stephen Breyer, Guide to Stephen Bryer,judicial opinions,
Guide to Stephen Breyer

Supreme Court -- has it gotten dangerous enough yet?

Remember what the Federalist Papers (78) said about the Supreme Court?

Ginsburg and Breyer - lawless Supreme COurt Justice appointed by a lawless president?

Supreme Court Justices

Seven Habits of Highly Effective People (so you can effectively learn about the Supreme Court, or anything else) should be used in conjunction with First Things First. Click here to buy Seven Habits for $4.96 and Click here to buy First Things First for $11.20

Page a Minute Memory Book (so you an remember things about the Supreme Court, your wife's birthday, your boy friends phone number or anything else). hClick here to learn more about, or to buy, the Page a Minute Memory Book for $9.20

More American History Resources

Dick's Guide to a Free College Level Course in American History since 1865

1215 Magna Carter

Patriarcha

Leviathan

English Constitution

1688 Glorious Revolution

1786 Federalist Papers 45 and 46 by James Madison explaining why the proposed federal government would not exceed the powers of the State governments

1788 The USA was founded as a Christian government

1863 Reconstruction

President Lincoln and President Johnson's views of Reconstruction

1865 Republican Radicals

1866 The Fourteenth Amendement

1867 Congress Took Charge of Reconstruction

1870 The Fifteenth Amendment

1870 After The Civil War and Reconstructior

1869-76 Grant as President and the Hayes/Tilden debacle

1876 The Dirty Politics of The Industrial Age, Local, State and National

1877 Compromise; Dick's Guide to the Compromise of 1877

1880-1913 The USA Becomes an Industrial Giant by 1900

1880-1913 American Society in the Industrial Age

1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement leads to World War II, Dick's Guide to American History

1917 Post World War I, Society and Culture: Change and Adjustment

1917 Urban and Rural Conflicts After World War I (The Great War)

1921-1933 The New Era: 1921-1933

1933 The New Deal: 1933-1941

1936 The Election of 1936, FDR beats Landon, 60% of popular vote, 98% of electoral

1937 FDR takes on Supreme Court; loses fights with nine old judges and loses to stack court

1944-45 Yalta and Potsdam

1945 Post World War II society - The Baby Boomers

1946 America's Post World War Containment Policy directed at Soviet Expansionism

1947 The Marshall Plan was created during the Truman Years

1948 The Election of 1948, Truman beats Thomas Dewey and Strom Thurmond's Dixiecrats

1950 The Korean War

1950 McCarthyism

1951 Truman sets up a Loyalty Review Board in 1951 to fight Communism at home

1952 Dwight D. Eisenhower

1971 UNITED STATES v. VUITCH

1992 Bill Clinton

1998 President Clinton Acts as a Role Model for American Men

2001 Lying, adulterous womanizing Congressman Condit apologizes (sort of)

GENERAL TOPICS

America's Lost Limited Government, King Kong Federalism:

Dick's Guide to American History Biographies

American History, Free College Level Course (Old Version, but it does have many links missing in the version above)

American Nation (The) by John A. Garraty

American History Educational Resources on the WWW

Clinton, Bill Acts as a Role Model

Lincoln, Abraham - Online

Politician Scandals before the 1990's

Presidents in the 19th Century

Presidents in the 20th Century

Bill Clinton's Presidency

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can help Dick keep Dick's Guides free by shopping at the word's largest internet mall right here. l

If you need to make extra money, or want to simply work at home, look at Dick's free business opportunities at free business opportunities

Primary Source materials about American history President Clinton's Supreme Court justice appointments

To provide a proper citation for this page, to use in a class paper or anything else, I am providing two proper MLA citation formats. One format is for Web based information, the other is for those who have professors, teachers or others who do not believe in the Web as a source for information. It is for Published Articles, which this page certainly is.

Format 1 (Web based information)

Amann, Richard. Dick's Guide to American history: President Clinton's Supreme Court justice appointments GA. Online. Dick's Guides Publications. Available: http://dicksguides2.com/AH_President Clinton's Supreme Court justice appointments, Date of your visit to the site

Format 2, (Article based information)

Amann, Richard. "Dick's Guide to American history: President Clinton's Supreme Court justice appointments August 13, 2001 : 931

For more information about proper Web citations click on this Savvy Search

____________________________________________________________________________________

Click below if you need

$25 (No kidding! No tricks! No cost!) http://www.freeipo.com/popularlink/step1.html After you sign up ofr this $25, you will get an identification number in an email. You will be instructed to go to a second page to verify you have the number. At this point you will also need to enter my email address, ramann2996@aol.com. Once your finished YOU can give $ 25 to your friends and families.

A free vacation at VacationsForFree.html

Someone to love! Meet your Match! CLICK HERE to go to Dick's Guides' Dating Service. Dicksguides.com is a proud member of the One & Only Associate Network.

Cheap phone service with, for example, long distance rates as low as they go, cellular service and calling cards, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Dicks telecommunications shop.

Low cost, comprehensive ways to buy a car, using the pricing power of internet competition and information at Automobile and related car information on the web.

Free opportunities to get paid to read email and surf the web opportunities. (When I first wrote this in the year 2000 these folks WERE paying for browsing. I was making $20 to $30 a month just for turning on my GoToWorld web browser. In the summer of 2001 the checks were starting to dry up, so I can no longer personally vouch for any of these following guys -- at this time. I'd love to hear from you if you have had any experience with them, especially if they are paying you. ramann2997@aol.com.
The GoToWorld browser that is REALLY available, now. http://www.gotoworld.com/getpaid/default.asp?rid=1012310796
AllAdvantage at: http://www.alladvantage.com/refhome.asp?refid=CLC422
Allcommunity http://allcommunity.com/all.members/dicksguides/
Amazing Solutions pays you up to 50 cents read a single email. http://www.amazingsolution.com/index.cgi?CDG8244 WARNING: You can NOT finish the sign on process and survey without entering your "GDG" code and my "GDG" code which is: 8244
Desktop Horizon another web surfer opportunity http://www.desktophorizon.com/index.html?referrer=dicksguide
Deal Viewer at http://g1n.com/group_manager/members/dicksguide.html WARNING: You are asked to input my identification number but the form really wants the name dicksguide. This site will pay $1 for each hour you browse. After you get your identification "number" you need to confirm it at http://g1n.com/group_manager/members_only/menu.cgi
DotAd.com at http://www.dotad.com/Default.asp?ID=49666
Epipo, another pay to surf site at http://209.196.153.21/sine.asp?dicksguides
Hitmaster http://www.data-x.com/hitmaster/acc.asp?rid=5246 This site pays you for looking at up to three ads per day. You also get credit for others you get to look at three ads per day. You will get two URLs from Hitmaster. One is for you to use to sign up a downline. The other is for you to use to go and view the ads.
Sendmoreinfo http://www.sendmoreinfo.com/SubMakeCookie.cfm?ExtractId=38428 is another opportunity to get paid to read email.
Sharkhunt at: http://www.sharkhunt.com/refer/refer_form.asp?shID=dicksguides
Spedia.Net http://www.spedia.net/cgi-bin/dir/tz.cgi?run=show_svc&fl=8&vid=108749
Surfing2Cash http://www.surfing2cash.com/4193

Low cost flowers for the one you love

Free opportunities to sell low cost telecommunication and phone services
Cognigen's telecommunication business. http://ld.net/bizop/?dicksguides. (in the summer of 2001 my checks from Cognigen had grown to over $100 a month -- after about one year of listing them on my site.
Telefreedom's Flat rate long distance phone service http://www.kreepy123.com/members/10027/
TMMG http://www.tmmg.net/dicksguides/indexx.php3
Telefreedom USA http://gwc1.com/cgi-bin/view.cgi/da61570/ld.htm This next links you to TeleFreedom USA in Spanish,
http://gwc1.com/cgi-bin/view.cgi/da61570/ldsp.htm

Need more memory in your computer? Click here.

Free opportunities to earn commissions by representing
Arryval http://www.aryval.com/default.asp?id=ramann2996@aol.com This opportunity claims it lets you help others, Dress Sharper, Stay Healthier, Get Richer, Live Better, Love Longer and Go Farther. (I'm going to need to look into this more. I want everything they have to offer (In August of 2001, after linking to these guys for a year, I have not been paid much.)
Automobile business opportunity http://dicksguides.com/FreeBusinessOpportunityAutoSales.htm (My supplier of this (and other links like this) routinely sends me my highest monthly amounts -- several hundred dollars, usually.)
Global Strategist. This is a stock market game you can sell. http://www.globalstrategist.com/partner_program/index.cfm?KW=dicksguide (In the August 2001, after more than a year of linking to this guy I have never gotten a paycheck.)
Globion let's you be a travel agent, at http://www.globion.com/travel/default.asp?refid=3624 (This guy has changed his offer. In the August 2001, after more than a year of linking to this guy I have never gotten a paycheck.)
Legendary Ventures at http://superteam.com/hhp.cgi/dicksgui is a health business. In the August 2001, after more than a year of linking to this guy I have never gotten a paycheck. After I joined them, for free, I found I needed to buy from them to make anything.
LinkShare-Get Your Share! 250 web merchants will pay you commissions at http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/stat?id=9/Ej2KH/QIw&offerid=7097&type=3&subid=0 As of August 2001,without a doubt, I find linkshare to be one of the two most rewarding affiliate programs on the net.
Magic learning system. http://www.magiclearning.com/cgi/members/DA43256 To make money here you will need to sell the MasterMind Power Learning System, which the company feels enables "EVERYONE ... needs To Learn Anything. You choose ... languages, geography, sports statistics, trivia, math concepts and strategies, history, art, literature, vocabulary, birthdays and anniversaries, talks, jokes and stories ...wherever your imagination leads." The company is currently holding a Back To School Special. Check your replicated pages for more detail. As of August 13, 2001, after more than a year of linking to this guy I have never gotten a paycheck, but I still like the products.
Mardox http://www.mardox.com/mrf/1357.html As of August 13, 2001, after more than a year of linking to this guy I have never gotten a paycheck.
My Free Office http://www.myfreeoffice.com/dicksguides//directory.html As of August 13, 2001, after more than a year of linking to this guy I have never gotten a paycheck.
One & Only has several free business opportunities. As of August 13, 2001,without a doubt, I find One & Only to be one of the two most rewarding affiliate programs on the net. In some months I have received checks of over $700 from them

Clinton loses appeals in Lewinsky case

Clinton's Justices Pave Supreme Court's Middle Road

RAY ARCHER: With Clinton appointing judges, can we afford 4 more years?

Copyright © 1996 Nando.net Copyright © 1996 The Arizona Republic

Copyright © 1996 Nando.net
Copyright © 1996 The Arizona Republic