| Free
information from Dick's Cyberspace Mall, the
WORLD'S LARGEST
MALL You're visitor number
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dick's
Guide
to Clinton's winning the impeachment
battle while losing the war in Iraq
Summary: Dick's Guide to Clinton's winning the battle of impeachment while losing the war in Iraq provides links to books and other websites relating to Clinton and Iraq, as well as detailed information on Clinton's winning the battle in Iraq but losing the war. If there is still more information you need on Clinton's winning the battle in Iraq but losing the war, please ask us to do free research for you by sending email to ramann2997@AOL.com. The more information you can supply with your request for free research on Clinton's winning the battle in IRAQ but losing the war, the more we can help you. Ask us for the information you want, but also explain why you need the information (examples: I'm doing a high school term paper about ... , I'm doing business research to determine if ...). All Dick's Guides contain proper citations for bibliographies, in MLA formats. See below for proper citation. Synopsis: Bill Clinton's Impeachment Eve War with Iraq was concluded the day after impeachment, Sunday, December 20, 1998. Iraq declared victory and Chief U.N. weapons inspector Richard Butler confirmed it. Arab commentators, foreign ministers, and world leaders all knew the air strikes on Iraq boosted Saddam Hussein's standing among fellow Arabs and increased the likelihood of a dangerous conflict. Former U.S. allies in the Persian Gulf War and hard-liners agreed that the Clinton impeachment war was a big mistake, for the world. By Sunday December 20, 1998, even unnamed Clintonites were agreeing that Iraq had won, and the America's policy of containment of Iraq was in shambles. Iraq Declares Victory Saddam declared victory over the "enemies of God" as early as Saturday, impeachment day. Defense Secretary William Cohen dismissed the rhetoric as propaganda but admitted the damage was necessarily partial. He admitted that the United States is ready to strike again if Iraq shows signs of trying to revive its damaged weapons complexes. Cohen admitted Iraq's missile development and production capability has been set back only by about a year. Other facilities such as air defenses and airfields could recover more quickly. While these facts led Cohen to declare Saddam's victory speech "rhetorical," the rest of the world saw things more clearly. Iraq offered its own version of Clinton's declared victory. "They boasted of great success .... They lied," said Iraq's deputy prime minister, Tariq Aziz. Of course, right thinking Democrats were upset. They know that the president would never lie -- or, at least, he would only lie about private matters. Despite the Clinton Administration's reputation for truth, Aziz claimed that the U.S. and British airstrikes demolished only two of Iraq's main factories for producing parts for short-range missiles. These short-range missiles are permitted by the United Nations. The hundreds of millions of dollars spent for the high tech killing of Saddam's soldiers, yielded a four night total of 62 killed soldiers and 180 injured. Aziz released the figures at a news conference to back his claim that the United States failed to make any dent in the Iraqi military might. Of course, Democrats quickly countered that -- unlike America's president, the Iraq's deputy prime minister was a liar. Iraq's U.N. ambassador, Nizar Hamdoon, added that during the 4-day impeachment war thousands of non military people were killed or injured. Like Clinton's Democratic supporters at home, Nizar did not substantiate his claim. Iraqi officials took journalists to a street in the upscale Baghdad neighborhood of Karada where a missile left a hole and broke a water main that flooded a street. No obvious military targets were nearby. At Baghdad's Museum of Natural History, journalists saw that a missile put a two-foot hole in a wall and shattered glass display cases for stuffed lions and hyenas. After the final attack Saturday, reporters were taken to the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, where two missiles left a 40-foot hole and shattered windows. Journalists did see missiles hit in areas they believed contained headquarters of the Special Security Services and the command center of the paramilitary Popular Army. Iraqi officials also noted damage to a house belonging to Saddam's daughter Hala, where no one was home. They added, perhaps as salt in America's wound, that many facilities hit were being monitored by U.N. arms inspectors, such as the Nida heavy machinery factory south of Baghdad, the headquarters of the security police and military intelligence. The official Iraqi News Agency said a missile damaged a historic palace, parts of which date to 1180. Forgetting Democrats, for a moment, who do Americans believe? President Clinton and his loyal spokespeople, who said the 70-hour assault had severely damaged Iraq's ability to build weapons of mass destruction? Or, Iraq's deputy prime minister, Tariq Aziz and other Saddam spokespeople? Most of the world's citizens tended to believe Iraq. Chief U.N. Inspector Richard Butler Confirms Iraq's Win On post-impeachment Sunday, December 20, 1998, Butler admitted his feelings that the future of his commission to oversee the destruction of Iraq's banned weapons was uncertain after U.S. and British airstrikes on Iraq. His comments came amid increasing calls from around the world for a re-evaluation of the U.N. Special Commission, or UNSCOM, and intensified criticism of Butler and Clinton, including calls for their ouster. Despite the multi-day impeachment bomb and missile strikes, Butler admitted Iraq still needed to account for and destroy its weapons of mass destruction. Foreign Ministers Signal Problems for Future Inspections Clinton's bombing creates the real possibility that UNSCOM will not be able to continue inspections called for by Security Council resolutions that ended the 1991 Gulf War. Indeed with impeachment day looming, Clinton's four days of U.S. and British airstrikes drew condemnation from permanent council members Russia and China. Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said the airstrikes had destroyed the intricate system of monitoring that inspectors had spent the last seven years establishing. France agreed. In Paris, President Jacques Chirac said France would be willing to support a ``new organization, new methods'' so the United Nations could maintain control over Iraq's weapons. Russia and China have been leary of attacking the adulterous, lying Clinton, but have strongly criticized Butler's tactics in the past and accused him last week of presenting a biased, dishonest evaluation. Egyptian Foreign Minister Amr Moussa called for a re-evaluation of UNSCOM's role and urged the United Nations to fire Butler. Like Russian and Chinese diplomats he did not call for the resignation of Bill Clinton, the man who unleashed the attack. World Media Agrees Iraq Won and Clinton Lost ``The strike ends, but Saddam remains,'' said the Saudi newspaper Okaz. A cartoon showed Saddam in an underground bunker, relaxing in an armchair with a cigar while watching TV coverage of the bombardment. Even Iran, which fought an eight-year war against neighboring Iraq had its State-run Teheran Radio criticize the United States (and Britain) for taking unilateral military action. It said the lack of U.N. approval for the bombing indicates the Americans and British ``want to resort to unilateral military action whenever they deem it fit,'' the broadcast said. The Omani newspaper Al-Watan said the airstrikes had ``failed to weaken Saddam Hussein internally and increased his popularity among the Arabs.'' It added that the strikes resulted in Iraq's decision to end all dealings with UNSCOM. Iraq Lays Down Gauntlet The battered Iraq's, Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan announced that Baghdad would no longer work with UNSCOM, declaring ``its mission is over.'' One sure result of the strikes appears to be the end of U.N. weapons inspections. Nizar Hamdoon, Iraq's ambassador to the United Nations, said on CNN it was highly unlikely that U.N. weapons inspections could resume. Iraq, along with many American and world observers, criticized Butler and accused him of being a puppet of Washington. Butler, like the lying American president, has said he has no intention of quitting. Clintonites Float Trial Balloons Admitting America Lost. An unnamed White House national security adviser floated a balloon on Sunday, December 20, 1998. He admitted the US now needed to make a "deliberate, sustained" effort to overthrow Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. Unnamed Clinton lovers acknowledged that Iraq retains some of its deadly weapons capability. With the benefits of inspection lost, they admitted the Iraq would have to be attacked, again and again. President Clinton's foreign policy team trotted around America's Sunday -- post-impeachment war day -- talk shows. They desperately tried to cover up the truth, carrying photos that showed the rubble of Iraqi, claiming the rubble was of weapons facilities, but admitting that an Iraqi threat remains. Clinton apologist, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright -- now that it was impossible to ensure no new Iraqi weapons -- exposed the new goal for America. "We would like to see a different regime. That is what we are going to be working towards by more active support of the various opposition groups.'' U.S. intelligence officials and outside experts have always agreed, however, that Iraqi opposition groups are in no position to challenge Saddam's heavily armed and entrenched government and military. Overthrowing Saddam from within was also championed as the new American policy by national security adviser Sandy Berger. He said, "we are determined to pursue that objective in a very steady, deliberate, sustained way." The first Clinton attempt to float the new policy, while simultaneously getting the world's mind off America's change in policy occurred Sunday, on the talk shows of America. U.S. policy had centered on the long-standing containment of Iraq that had gone on without interruption since the end of the 1991 Persian Gulf War. Inspection was the backbone of this policy. Now containment and inspection were to be replaced by a policy of getting rid of Saddam. The Clinton administrations acknowledgement of the new policy was only exposed because Republicans questioned the ultimate aim of U.S. strategy against Iraq. Risking being labeled a Clinton hater by mean spirited leftists and chanting Democratic lawmakers, Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, on "Fox News Sunday", asked, "What precisely is the policy?" Without Inspections Iraq Won the First War. UNSCOM and the International Atomic Energy Agency were supposed to certify that Iraq has destroyed any chemical, biological and nuclear weapons it has, and the long-range missiles used to deliver them, before the council would lift sanctions imposed after Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990. Clinton's impeachment day war on Iraq ended this large mission. Clinton won the 4 day battle, but lost the war of worldwide public pinion and the ability to maintain a consensus for future inspections. Iraq will now be able to secretly develop and deliver its technologies for mass, indiscriminate murder. World leaders generally agreed that, after Clinton's impeachment war battle, the essential problem of containing Saddam remains. Saddam remains standing -- and that the strikes ended any hope of Iraqi cooperation with weapons inspections. Americans lose, too. More attacks on Americans likely "Oh Arabs: Expel the American and British Ambassadors from the Arab capitals,'" said the Sawt al-Umma, an independent weekly. ``Strike American interests,'' said Al-Arabi, a weekly mouthpiece of the Nasserite Party. More than 3,000 people marched in Amman, Jordan, shouting, "Clinton, you coward, go hunt after women." Before Clinton's impeachment war Morocco was valued by Washington as a stable ally in North Africa. After the start of the impeachment war about 100,000 people demonstrated in the capital of Rabat, to protest the airstrikes. In the Netherlands, 4,000 people gathered outside the U.S. Consulate in Amsterdam to protest the military action. Demonstrators threw stones and scuffled with police. One officer was injured. Activists splattered the walls of the U.S. embassy in Madrid, Spain, with red paint to protest the bombing raids and the continuing sanctions. In Bangladesh, about 500 activists marchers shouted ``Down with U.S. imperialism!'' and other slogans against American and British leaders. They later burned an effigy of Clinton. At the Vatican, Pope John Paul II expressed sadness over the airstrikes and bitterness that the crisis couldn't have been solved by peaceful means. He said, "The holiday atmosphere renders even more intense the suffering for all that has happened in these days to the Iraqi people, in the face of whose drama no one can remain indifferent,".
You can help Dick keep Dick's Guides free by shopping at anyone of Dick's Mall Locations for
You can help Dick keep Dick's Guides free by shopping at anyone of Dick's Mall Locations
Primary Source materials about Clinton's winning the battle in IRAQ but losing the war:
Books about Clinton's winning the battle in IRAQ but losing the war
See this search for other web sites with similar information about Political Science Terms and Words
To provide a proper citation for this page, to use in a class paper or anything else, I am providing two proper MLA citation formats. One format is for Web based information, the other is for those who have professors, teachers or others who do not believe in the Web as a source for information. It is for Published Articles, which this page certainly is. Format 1 (Web based information) Amann, Richard. Dick's Guide to Clinton's winning the battle in IRAQ but losing the war. GA. Online. Dick's Guides Publications. Available: http://dicksguides.com/ClintonIRAQwarloss.html. Date of your visit to the site As additional information I provide on my pages the following information: Published: October, 1998. Last Update:
Format 2, (Article based information) Amann, Richard. "Dick's Guide to ClintonIRAQWarLoss." Dick's Guide to Academic Knowledge, March 1, 1998 : 930 For more information about proper Web citations click on this Savvy Search
Try all of Dick's Guides New Internet Super Fantastic Malls, Mall for Books, Mall for Romance Books Visit Dick's Guide's Super Malls, Mall.html, Book Mall, The Romance Book Mall with over 29,000 titles Meet your Match! CLICK HERE to go to Dick's Guides' Dating Service. Dicksguides.com is a proud member of the One & Only Associate Network. See EPage for great auctions and classifieds! Click below if you need
to buy discounted
books
Return to Welcome to Dick's Guides or Dick's Guide's Free Service for Research Reports and Questions or Dick's Guide Resource Library or Money Making Opportunities for Students or How Older American Politicians, Lawyers and Bureaucrats Screw Young People, all the time
Dick's Guide to Free URL Registration Sites (I have used these sites to get free registration for Dick's Guides on various Search Engines. They work and they are free! Use them to spread the word about your Web Page.) Search Engines I have known and loved
So be it | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dick's Guide to Clinton's winning the impeachment battle in Iraq while losing the war
You can help Dick keep Dick's Guides free by shopping at anyone of Dick's Mall Locations
| Books | Computers | Dating Services | Email Accounts for free | Flowers for all occasions | Music CD's and cassettes | |
| Magazines for free | Movies | Sporting Goods | Toys | Videos |
Summary: Dick's Guide to Clinton's winning the battle in Iraq but losing the war provides links to books and other websites relating to Clinton and Iraq, as well as detailed information on Clinton's winning the battle in Iraq but losing the war. If there is still more information you need on Clinton's winning the battle in Iraq but losing the war, please ask us to do free research for you by sending email to ramann2997@AOL.com. The more information you can supply with your request for free research on Clinton's winning the battle in IRAQ but losing the war, the more we can help you. Ask us for the information you want, but also explain why you need the information (examples: I'm doing a high school term paper about ... , I'm doing business research to determine if ...). All Dick's Guides contain proper citations for bibliographies, in MLA formats. See below for proper citation.
Synopsis: Bill Clinton's Impeachment Eve War with Iraq was concluded the day after impeachment, Sunday, December 20, 1998. Iraq declared victory and Chief U.N. weapons inspector Richard Butler confirmed it. Arab commentators, foreign ministers, and world leaders all knew the airstrikes on Iraq boosted Saddam Hussein's standing among fellow Arabs and increased the likelihood of a dangerous conflict. Former U.S. allies in the Persian Gulf War and hard-liners agreed that the Clinton impeachment war was a big mistake, for the world. By Sunday December 20, 1998, even unnamed Clintonites were agreeing that Iraq had won, and the America's policy of containment of Iraq was in shambles.
Iraq Declares Victory
Saddam declared victory over the "enemies of God" as early as Saturday, impeachment day. Defense Secretary William Cohen dismissed the rhetoric as propaganda but admitted the damage was necessarily partial. He admitted that the United States is ready to strike again if Iraq shows signs of trying to revive its damaged weapons complexes. Cohen admitted Iraq's missile development and production capability has been set back only by about a year. Other facilities such as air defenses and airfields could recover more quickly. While these facts led Cohen to declare Saddam's victory speech "rhetorical," the rest of the world saw things more clearly.
Iraq offered its own version of Clinton's declared victory. "They boasted of great success .... They lied," said Iraq's deputy prime minister, Tariq Aziz. Of course, right thinking Democrats were upset. They know that the president would never lie -- or, at least, he would only lie about private matters. Despite the Clinton Administration's reputation for truth, Aziz claimed that the U.S. and British airstrikes demolished only two of Iraq's main factories for producing parts for short-range missiles. These short-range missiles are permitted by the United Nations. The hundreds of millions of dollars spent for the high tech killing of Saddam's soldiers, yielded a four night total of 62 killed soldiers and 180 injured. Aziz released the figures at a news conference to back his claim that the United States failed to make any dent in the Iraqi military might. Of course, Democrats quickly countered that -- unlike America's president, the Iraq's deputy prime minister was a liar. Iraq's U.N. ambassador, Nizar Hamdoon, added that during the 4-day impeachment war thousands of non military people were killed or injured. Like Clinton's Democratic supporters at home, Nizar did not substantiate his claim.
Iraqi officials took journalists to a street in the upscale Baghdad neighborhood of Karada where a missile left a hole and broke a water main that flooded a street. No obvious military targets were nearby. At Baghdad's Museum of Natural History, journalists saw that a missile put a two-foot hole in a wall and shattered glass display cases for stuffed lions and hyenas. After the final attack Saturday, reporters were taken to the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, where two missiles left a 40-foot hole and shattered windows. Journalists did see missiles hit in areas they believed contained headquarters of the Special Security Services and the command center of the paramilitary Popular Army.
Iraqi officials also noted damage to a house belonging to Saddam's daughter Hala, where no one was home. They added, perhaps as salt in America's wound, that many facilities hit were being monitored by U.N. arms inspectors, such as the Nida heavy machinery factory south of Baghdad, the headquarters of the security police and military intelligence. The official Iraqi News Agency said a missile damaged a historic palace, parts of which date to 1180.
Forgetting Democrats, for a moment, who do Americans believe? President Clinton and his loyal spokespeople, who said the 70-hour assault had severely damaged Iraq's ability to build weapons of mass destruction? Or, Iraq's deputy prime minister, Tariq Aziz and other Saddam spokespeople? Most of the world's citizens tended to believe Iraq.
Chief U.N. Inspector Richard Butler Confirms Iraq's Win
On post-impeachment Sunday, December 20, 1998, Butler admitted his feelings that the future of his commission to oversee the destruction of Iraq's banned weapons was uncertain after U.S. and British airstrikes on Iraq. His comments came amid increasing calls from around the world for a re-evaluation of the U.N. Special Commission, or UNSCOM, and intensified criticism of Butler and Clinton, including calls for their ouster. Despite the multi-day impeachment bomb and missile strikes, Butler admitted Iraq still needed to account for and destroy its weapons of mass destruction.
Foreign Ministers Signal Problems for Future Inspections
Clinton's bombing creates the real possibility that UNSCOM will not be able to continue inspections called for by Security Council resolutions that ended the 1991 Gulf War. Indeed with impeachment day looming, Clinton's four days of U.S. and British airstrikes drew condemnation from permanent council members Russia and China. Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said the airstrikes had destroyed the intricate system of monitoring that inspectors had spent the last seven years establishing. France agreed. In Paris, President Jacques Chirac said France would be willing to support a ``new organization, new methods'' so the United Nations could maintain control over Iraq's weapons.
Russia and China have been leary of attacking the adulterous, lying Clinton, but have strongly criticized Butler's tactics in the past and accused him last week of presenting a biased, dishonest evaluation.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Amr Moussa called for a re-evaluation of UNSCOM's role and urged the United Nations to fire Butler. Like Russian and Chinese diplomats he did not call for the resignation of Bill Clinton, the man who unleashed the attack.
World Media Agrees Iraq Won and Clinton Lost
``The strike ends, but Saddam remains,'' said the Saudi newspaper Okaz. A cartoon showed Saddam in an underground bunker, relaxing in an armchair with a cigar while watching TV coverage of the bombardment.
Even Iran, which fought an eight-year war against neighboring Iraq had its State-run Teheran Radio criticize the United States (and Britain) for taking unilateral military action. It said the lack of U.N. approval for the bombing indicates the Americans and British ``want to resort to unilateral military action whenever they deem it fit,'' the broadcast said.
The Omani newspaper Al-Watan said the airstrikes had ``failed to weaken Saddam Hussein internally and increased his popularity among the Arabs.'' It added that the strikes resulted in Iraq's decision to end all dealings with UNSCOM.
Iraq Lays Down Gauntlet
The battered Iraq's, Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan announced that Baghdad would no longer work with UNSCOM, declaring ``its mission is over.'' One sure result of the strikes appears to be the end of U.N. weapons inspections. Nizar Hamdoon, Iraq's ambassador to the United Nations, said on CNN it was highly unlikely that U.N. weapons inspections could resume. Iraq, along with many American and world observers, criticized Butler and accused him of being a puppet of Washington. Butler, like the lying American president, has said he has no intention of quitting.
Clintonites Float Trial Balloons Admitting America Lost.
An unnamed White House national security adviser floated a balloon on Sunday, December 20, 1998. He admitted the US now needed to make a "deliberate, sustained" effort to overthrow Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. Unnamed Clinton lovers acknowledged that Iraq retains some of its deadly weapons capability. With the benefits of inspection lost, they admitted the Iraq would have to be attacked, again and again.
President Clinton's foreign policy team trotted around America's Sunday -- post-impeachment war day -- talk shows. They desperately tried to cover up the truth, carrying photos that showed the rubble of Iraqi, claiming the rubble was of weapons facilities, but admitting that an Iraqi threat remains.
Clinton apologist, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright -- now that it was impossible to ensure no new Iraqi weapons -- exposed the new goal for America. "We would like to see a different regime. That is what we are going to be working towards by more active support of the various opposition groups.''
U.S. intelligence officials and outside experts have always agreed, however, that Iraqi opposition groups are in no position to challenge Saddam's heavily armed and entrenched government and military. Overthrowing Saddam from within was also championed as the new American policy by national security adviser Sandy Berger. He said, "we are determined to pursue that objective in a very steady, deliberate, sustained way."
The first Clinton attempt to float the new policy, while simultaneously getting the world's mind off America's change in policy occurred Sunday, on the talk shows of America. U.S. policy had centered on the long-standing containment of Iraq that had gone on without interruption since the end of the 1991 Persian Gulf War. Inspection was the backbone of this policy. Now containment and inspection were to be replaced by a policy of getting rid of Saddam. The Clinton administrations acknowledgement of the new policy was only exposed because Republicans questioned the ultimate aim of U.S. strategy against Iraq. Risking being labeled a Clinton hater by mean spirited leftists and chanting Democratic lawmakers, Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, on "Fox News Sunday", asked, "What precisely is the policy?"
Without Inspections Iraq Won the First War.
UNSCOM and the International Atomic Energy Agency were supposed to certify that Iraq has destroyed any chemical, biological and nuclear weapons it has, and the long-range missiles used to deliver them, before the council would lift sanctions imposed after Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990. Clinton's impeachment day war on Iraq ended this large mission. Clinton won the 4 day battle, but lost the war of worldwide public pinion and the ability to maintain a consensus for future inspections. Iraq will now be able to secretly develop and deliver its technologies for mass, indiscriminate murder. World leaders generally agreed that, after Clinton's impeachment war battle, the essential problem of containing Saddam remains. Saddam remains standing -- and that the strikes ended any hope of Iraqi cooperation with weapons inspections.
Americans lose, too. More attacks on Americans likely
"Oh Arabs: Expel the American and British Ambassadors from the Arab capitals,'" said the Sawt al-Umma, an independent weekly. ``Strike American interests,'' said Al-Arabi, a weekly mouthpiece of the Nasserite Party. More than 3,000 people marched in Amman, Jordan, shouting, "Clinton, you coward, go hunt after women."
Before Clinton's impeachment war Morocco was valued by Washington as a stable ally in North Africa. After the start of the impeachment war about 100,000 people demonstrated in the capital of Rabat, to protest the airstrikes. In the Netherlands, 4,000 people gathered outside the U.S. Consulate in Amsterdam to protest the military action. Demonstrators threw stones and scuffled with police. One officer was injured.
Activists splattered the walls of the U.S. embassy in Madrid, Spain, with red paint to protest the bombing raids and the continuing sanctions. In Bangladesh, about 500 activists marchers shouted ``Down with U.S. imperialism!'' and other slogans against American and British leaders. They later burned an effigy of Clinton.
At the Vatican, Pope John Paul II expressed sadness over the airstrikes and bitterness that the crisis couldn't have been solved by peaceful means. He said, "The holiday atmosphere renders even more intense the suffering for all that has happened in these days to the Iraqi people, in the face of whose drama no one can remain indifferent,".
You can help Dick keep Dick's Guides free by shopping at anyone of Dick's Mall Locations for
| Books | Computers | Dating Services | Email Accounts for free | Flowers for all occasions | Music CD's and cassettes | |
| Magazines for free | Movies | Sporting Goods | Toys | Videos |
Primary Source materials about Clinton's winning the battle in IRAQ but losing the war:
Books about Clinton's winning the battle in IRAQ but losing the war
See this search for other web sites with similar information about Political Science Terms and Words
To provide a proper citation for this page, to use in a class paper or anything else, I am providing two proper MLA citation formats. One format is for Web based information, the other is for those who have professors, teachers or others who do not believe in the Web as a source for information. It is for Published Articles, which this page certainly is.
Format 1 (Web based information)
Amann, Richard. Dick's Guide to Clinton's winning the battle in IRAQ but losing the war. GA. Online. Dick's Guides Publications. Available: http://dicksguides.com/ClintonIRAQwarloss.html. Date of your visit to the site
As additional information I provide on my pages the following information:
Published: October, 1998. Last Update:
FastCounter by
LinkExchange
About the Author: Richard Amann
Format 2, (Article based information)
Amann, Richard. "Dick's Guide to ClintonIRAQWarLoss." Dick's Guide to Academic Knowledge, March 1, 1998 : 930
For more information about proper Web citations click on this Savvy Search
Try all of Dick's Guides New Internet Super Fantastic Malls, Mall for Books, Mall for Romance Books
Visit Dick's Guide's Super Malls, Mall.html, Book Mall, The Romance Book Mall with over 29,000 titles
Meet your Match! CLICK HERE to go to Dick's Guides' Dating Service. Dicksguides.com is a proud member of the One & Only Associate Network.
See EPage for great auctions and classifieds!
Click below if you need
Free Magazines, from Sports
Illustrated to Time to Yahoo Life
Free AOL software and a free introductory
AOL trial
a business you can start with no money
See
EPage for great auctions and
classifieds!
a free and unique way to enhance
your opportunities to get into college or find a job.
to clean up your credit report
to stop foreclosure on your home
Help on advertising your
website
A free analysis of Your Web Site
Low computer prices available
for Dick's Guides' users . Click on this button
to find out the low cost for you to own an inexpensive, powerful and new
computer.
MARKETING HELP ON THE INTERNET?
Low cost autoresponders, web space, domain names, secured forms, and more,
are available to you, as a user of Dick's Guides. Write down this discount
code RA13933 and then click on this button.
to buy discounted
books
to
buy discounted CD's
to meet a woman, or a man, or find a pen
pal
to send flowers to the one you love
Return to Welcome to Dick's Guides or Dick's Guide's Free Service for Research Reports and Questions or Dick's Guide Resource Library or Money Making Opportunities for Students or How Older American Politicians, Lawyers and Bureaucrats Screw Young People, all the time
Dick's Guide to Free URL Registration Sites (I have used these sites to get free registration for Dick's Guides on various Search Engines. They work and they are free! Use them to spread the word about your Web Page.)
Search Engines I have known and loved
Got a bad
memory? Want to remind yourself of something on this page? Want
to send an email message to remind someone else to look at the page?
Click here to remember
So be it
|
|
